For
this week’s reading assignment the class looked at The Historian’s Macroscope: Big Data in Digital History by Graham,
Milligan, and Weingart. The Historian’s
Microscope is a unique publication as the open draft version subtitle
explains, it was “an experiment in writing in public, one page at a time.” So
what does that mean? Well, the authors wrote the draft of the book online, then,
as the public commented on the draft, the authors revised their manuscript
based on feedback from the comments. Once the revision process was finished,
the authors launched their book on November 17, 2015.
What
is fascinating about this book is that not only is it available in print, but
the book’s pre-publication “Final Draft” is made available online, free of
charge. With permission from the press, the authors kept the final draft
available online free of charge for those who are unable to afford it. The
publishers agreed to this arrangement based on the agreement that as long as
the free version did not hurt the book’s sales, then the free version would be
able to remain online. If it did hurt sales, however, the authors agreed to
remove the online version. It is likely that the publisher agreed to this
arrangement hoping that those who could afford the book would purchase it (as
the authors encourage their readers to do), and believing that those who could
not afford the textbook would not have bought it in the first place. Reading
the free online version of the book, I most definitely recommend that those who
are in the field of digital history purchase the book to use as a resource.
So
who is this book for exactly? Well, according to the authors their “ideal reader
is an advanced undergraduate looking for guidance as they encounter big data
for the first time” (13). This book could be used in undergraduate and graduate
digital history courses. It could also be used by researchers trying to figure
out how to effectively research their topic using digital tools. Yet, while the
book’s intended audience ranges from students, to instructors, to researchers,
anyone interested in learning to manipulate digital tools can benefit from
reading this book.
Being
a good resource for a variety of people, this book reflects its authors varying
areas of expertise. For example, one of the authors, Ian Milligan, is an
assistant professor of digital and Canadian history at the University of
Waterloo. Bringing in experience in text analyzes and data mining, Milligan
believes that anyone can learn to do computational work. Another author, Scott
Weingart, is the digital humanities specialist at Carnegie Mellon University.
Scott is unique in that he has a dual graduate degree in the history of science
and information science. The final author, Shawn Graham, is an associate
professor of digital humanities at Carleton University. Shawn is unique in that
while he was originally trained in Roman archeology, he has used his talent to
become a digital archeologist and digital humanist. Together, these three men
bring a unique variety of expertise to the subject of digital history and big
data.
Tackling
the topic of digital history and big data, the authors structure their book in
a specific way. Divided into three sections, the authors effectively structure
their book around three areas of emphasis: the first part of the book provides
an overview of the field of digital history, the second part of the book holds
an “emphasis hands-on textual analysis,” and the third part of the book looks
as networks as being a type of analysis and a powerful visualization (11). While
I found the book to be well written, I found it somewhat disengaging. Although I
think the authors did a phenomenal job of explaining the various digital tools
(what they are, why we should use them, even how to download and operate them),
I personally struggled to stay engaged as a reader. For example, I found the
authors explanation of regular expressions to be very thorough – consequently,
if I ever need to use regular expressions, this book is an incredible resource.
Yet, since I do not have a need for regular expressions at the moment, I
struggled to stay engaged reading this part of the book. Nevertheless, the
authors are incredibly thorough in their research (evidenced by their
footnotes) and coaching (evidenced in the many illustrations demonstrating how
to use technology). Looking at the interactive visualizations, however, I found
them a little confusing to use (but, they do look really cool).
Still,
even though I found myself struggling to stay engaged with some of the more
advanced digital tools, I found some of the more simple tools effectively
explained and presented in the book. Personally, I really enjoyed experimenting
with wordle.net. Overall, this book is a great resource and I would most
definitely recommend it to others.
As
a final note – one interesting thing about the book is that the authors
published an online companion essay, "Diversity
in Digital History," Acknowledging that it is impossible to cover
everything in digital history in one book, the authors explain how they regret
including to cover diversity and equality. Believing that digital humanities
should not be “a playground for the privileged,” the authors explain that
diversity and equality is an important topic vital to the field.
Thank you v. much for your kind words; I hope you find the book useful into the future. Stupid regular expressions eh? - they're awful to read about, but *super* handy. ;)
ReplyDelete